The survey has 43 entries.
| 1. Dean Stevens has been forthright and honest with the College of Engineering and Computer Science faculty members while reorganizing the College in Spring 2009. | ||
| 3 | 7% | Agree |
| 40 | 93% | Disagree |
| 2. The Engineering faculty have had a strong voice in the reorganization of the College of Engineering and Computer Science. | ||
| 0 | 0% | Agree |
| 43 | 100% | Disagree |
| 3. The reorganization was motivated by Dean Stevens’ interest in improving the quality of the programs in the College. | ||
| 8 | 19% | Agree |
| 35 | 81% | Disagree |
| 4. One motive for the reorganization was to make it easier for administrators to lay off tenured faculty in the College. | ||
| 37 | 86% | Agree |
| 6 | 14% | Disagree |
| 5. The layoff of the five tenured faculty members was necessary for the College’s continued fiscal viability. | ||
| 3 | 7% | Agree |
| 40 | 93% | Disagree |
| 6. The three [four] Functional Units are reasonable ways to organize the research and teaching activities of the College. | ||
| 5 | 12% | Agree |
| 38 | 88% | Disagree |
| 7. The creation of functional units will make it easier for tenured faculty to be laid off. | ||
| 39 | 91% | Agree |
| 4 | 9% | Disagree |
| 8. I have confidence in Dean Karl Stevens’ administrative capacities and continued leadership of FAU’s College of Engineering. | ||
| 6 | 14% | Agree |
| 37 | 86% | Disagree |